<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Switching from phpGroupware to eGroupware ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/2008/09/16/switching-from-phpgroupware-to-egroupware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/2008/09/16/switching-from-phpgroupware-to-egroupware/</link>
	<description>My WebLog at Intitut TELECOM, Télécom SudParis (ex GET/INT)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Berger</title>
		<link>http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/2008/09/16/switching-from-phpgroupware-to-egroupware/comment-page-1/#comment-98850</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/?p=219#comment-98850</guid>
		<description>Yes Eric, of course we&#039;re very carefully watching what&#039;s happening in the forges scene, to try and base the mid-term developments for our own use at Institut TELECOM. The more we can mutualize the effort, the better.

We&#039;ll closely try and keep close to what&#039;s happening with GForge for instance... so as GForge suffers some of the problems of legacy apps like phpGroupware too, it would be great to find a way to have GForge evolve to more modern technology too ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Eric, of course we&#8217;re very carefully watching what&#8217;s happening in the forges scene, to try and base the mid-term developments for our own use at Institut TELECOM. The more we can mutualize the effort, the better.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll closely try and keep close to what&#8217;s happening with GForge for instance&#8230; so as GForge suffers some of the problems of legacy apps like phpGroupware too, it would be great to find a way to have GForge evolve to more modern technology too <img src='http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric cousin</title>
		<link>http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/2008/09/16/switching-from-phpgroupware-to-egroupware/comment-page-1/#comment-98794</link>
		<dc:creator>eric cousin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/?p=219#comment-98794</guid>
		<description>And what about driving  picoforge project directly into others existing forges, instead of building it upon some more general framework ?
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about driving  picoforge project directly into others existing forges, instead of building it upon some more general framework ?<br />
Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

